Chain Tools
October 8, 2010 – 12:38 pm | No Comment

Welcome to ChainTools.com where you’ll find all of the Chain Tools you can’t find anywhere else. No matter what your needs are you will be able to find the right products, accessories, colors and brands …

Read the full story »
Decorating & Remodeling

Do It Yourself (DIY)

Engineering

Hobbies & Crafts

Motorcycles

Home » Physics

Has science found the absolute truth of natural phenomenons or relative truth?

Submitted by on July 18, 2009 – 4:00 pmOne Comment
chain tools
shiva prakash asked:

We know that universe is the chain of cause and effect. There is a tree of cause and effects in this universe and human being is also an effect (product) of the material nature. In this chain of cause and effect we have to notice that the courses of the secondary drivers are controlled by the drivers above it and hence the so called secondary drivers are not fully dependent. Only the driver that is above all is the fully dependent.

We know that our body itself is the cause of the nature. Even the mind, intelligence is affected by nature. Most of the scientists do not believe that there is God but nature might be making them think like that, because the course of it is dependent /controlled by drivers above it and so on.

As long we are in the body provided by nature we cannot determine the original driver/cause of the natural processes. How does an atheist/scientist who is affected by the creation talk about the original cause of this creation? Scientists may believe that one child driver/cause is the ultimate cause of this universe but there are may be many drivers above it. The illusion becomes stronger and stronger as you go up the driver tree. What causes Gravity to exist and act the way it does? Is it some greater “Prime Cause” like a God or a universal Force? As mentioned earlier, the original driver is the real driver and other child drivers are acting according to the original driver. Even if human uses sophisticated tools to determine to truth how can they confirm that they have reached the original driver? It may be a secondary driver who is driven by another driver and we cannot go up that level due to the illusion force. That is why Hindu scriptures mention about the concept called ‘Maya’. ‘Maya’ is a force created by God and it make you think that secondary drivers as real driver and real driver as non-existing. We can understand the real driver only if we are spiritually advanced.

Living beings have 4 levels of powers: physical, mental, intellectual and spiritual. It indicates that there is a higher power beyond brain power in us. Scientists know less about spirit and the power of the spiritually.

This is not philosophy. There are many proofs on existence of soul and many people have experienced it. This soul is described as one ten-thousandth part of the upper portion of the hair point in hindu scriptures. The reason why scientists have not able to find the existence of soul is becuase of 2 reasons: first is becuase of its minute size and second is it is difficult to realize. difficult to realize means distinguisting between me and mine. We have body, mind and intellect and it is mine but soul is me only, it is not mine. This self realization depends on the spiritual progress of man instead of intellectual progress.

One Comment »

  • voxygen8 says:

    Scientists don’t work with either absolute or relative truth. They work with provisional truth. Scientific truth is provisional because it is subject to the problem of induction: subsequent discoveries may falsify prior scientific theory.

    Spiritual “truth” is considered absolute only thanks to the starting point of assuming a conclusion without proving the validity of the premise. The Argument from First Causes, as paraphrased above in an example of this.

    In any case, from a scientific point of view, the spiritual arm waving is just begging the question: it provides no explanatory power that can be tested or falsified.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar .